• Comparison of Selected Outcomes Associated with Two Postoperative Analgesic Approaches in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

    Femoral nerve blocks (FNBs) and periarticular injections (PAIs) are often used for analgesia following bone and joint surgery. The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the association of analgesic technique with outcomes. All patients receiving total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a regional medical center in 2014 were analyzed. Patients were grouped by whether they received an FNB or PAI of bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (Exparel) for postoperative analgesia. Outcome variables of pain perception, morphine equivalents administered, length of stay, and total cost of care were compared using 2-tailed t tests. Readmission rate was examined using a 2-sample z test for proportions. One hundred forty-four patients were included in the study. This analysis demonstrated an association between receiving an FNB and less pain perception (P = .0497). Results also demonstrated a possible relationship between less opioid consumption in patients receiving a PAI of liposomal bupivacaine (P = .037). No statistical differences were found for the other variables. Receiving a FNB was preferable regarding patients’ pain perception. Patients received less opioid analgesic when they received a PAI, possibly relating to the particular surgeon performing the primary TKA. Patients were 5 times likelier to require hospital readmission in the PAI group.

    Keywords: Analgesia, anesthesia, arthroplasty, opioid, regional.

    For more than 40 years, elective surgical inventions for osteoarthritis have been performed seeking a better option than opioid analgesics for patients.1 Today, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become the standard of care for end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee (Figure 1). More than 80% of patients receiving TKA have substantial pain relief and functional improvement.2 The number of TKA procedures has more than doubled over the last decade.3 In 2013, approximately 4 million adults in the United States were living with TKA devices,4 and projections are that the demand for TKA will rise to 3.48 million procedures annually by 2030, an increase of 673%.4-6 Providing effective postoperative analgesia for TKA will be essential in successfully meeting the goals of cost reduction and high-quality care.7-11

    In our facility, along with many other centers, spinal anesthesia represents the primary anesthetic for the total joint recipient because it has been associated with improved outcomes12,13 over general anesthesia. Following return of motor and sensory pathways after spinal anesthesia, pain occurs. Both femoral nerve block (FNB) and periarticular injection (PAI) are advocated to reduce the pain (Figure 2). Failure of either modality to relieve pain results in an increased use of opioids. Inadequate pain relief and dependence on opioids within 24 to 36 hours are threats to early discharge criteria such as transfer out of bed to chair, ambulation, quadricep strength, and nausea and vomiting. Postoperative analgesia is vitally important for patients to meet the goals of discharge criteria.14 Prolonged hospital stays are often associated with opioid use for pain because of associated respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, falls, lack of mobility, and readmissions.15,16

    Findings of several studies support the benefits of peripheral nerve blocks17-25 (Figure 3). The benefits of using bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (Exparel) for PAI have also shown similar benefits for patients26-30 (Figure 4). At the time of this study, few comparisons were published examining FNB and PAI in the presence of a primary spinal anesthetic. The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in outcome variables comparing 2 postoperative analgesic approaches: FNB and PAI.

    Methods

    Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective analysis was conducted in all patients undergoing TKA during 2014 and receiving orthopedic surgical care at a regional medical center in the southeastern United States. Patients received a subarachnoid block as their primary anesthetic followed by either FNB or PAI. The choice of FNB or PAI was at the discretion of the surgeon. Femoral nerve blocks were placed in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) by 1 of 14 anesthesia providers experienced in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (anesthesiologist or Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist). Periarticular injections were placed in the operating room by 1 of 4 attending orthopedic surgeons. Patient data were obtained from the hospital electronic database. Patients were excluded from the study if they were receiving long-term opioid therapy that met or exceeded 3 continual months’ duration immediately before their primary joint replacement. Variables examined from the hospital record were patient pain perception, opiate use (morphine equivalents [MEs]), length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, total cost of care in the hospital, and readmission rate.

    Patient pain perception was defined using a 0 to 10 numeric pain rating scale value and recorded by a      registered nurse chronologically throughout the period beginning with patient admission to the PACU until discharge to home. These pain score values were captured and recorded in the electronic medical record at multiple intervals throughout the hospital stay during nursing assessments (independent of opioid administration) as well as before and after opioid administration. Total pain score data ranged from only a few entries per patient to several dozen entries depending on length of stay. These averages were compared between the FNB and PAI groups using a 2-tailed t test.

    Total opioid use for each patient’s entire hospital course was obtained from the nursing record for each patient. All opioid medications were ordered by the surgeon or other attending physician. There were 23 various medication combinations noted (Table 1). For standardizing use, an equianalgesic dose index was used. Criticisms exist in the proposed methods for equivalence calculations and the variability in how providers convert various opioids to a standard of measure.31 Therefore, we attempted to standardize equivalence by using morphine, 10 mg IV, as the benchmark with an index system that took into account potencies and bioavailability between oral and parenteral routes of administration.32 The relative potency of all opioid analgesics ordered by the various physicians was calculated as MEs. The total MEs for each patient was calculated. Differences in MEs for each group (FNB and PAI) were analyzed using a 2-tailed t test.

    Length of stay in the hospital, calculated as whole 24-hour periods, was obtained from the patient record. Minimum stay was 1 day, and maximum was 7 days. Patient readmissions, which were fewer than 30 days from discharge, were added to the LOS calculation. Total LOS for each group, FNB and PAI, was then compared using a 2-tailed t test.

    All hospital-associated costs related to the inpatient hospital course were compiled for each patient. This comprehensive cost database was compiled by the finance office and included the total amount that the institution billed to the third-party payers. This was represented as total cost of care. No cost related to private physician billing was included. Costs were summed for each group, FNB and PAI, and compared using a 2-tailed t test.

    Any patient receiving TKA during the study period who was readmitted within 30 days, for any reason, was included in the readmission group and recorded in the readmission rate. This rate, expressed as a percentage, was tabulated for both groups and compared using the 2-sample z test for proportions.

    Results

    After exclusion criteria were applied, there were 144 patients in the observational group: 71 patients in the FNB group and 73 in the PAI group. Demographically, our sample was reflective of the U.S. population as a whole in regard to marital status and gender (Figures 5 and 6).35,36 African American, Hispanic, and other ethnic affiliations represented 4.1% of the PAI group and 2.8% of the FNP group. These results support current evidence of African Americans’ reluctance to choose total joint replacement compared with whites.37 African Americans represent 22.2% of the population of the state; however, they represent only 1.8% of the county population in which this study was undertaken.38

    Figure 7 demonstrates how, beginning in 2013, orthopedic surgeons began to use PAI. By 2015, more than 80% of the orthopedic surgeons were opting for PAI over FNB. Figure 7 demonstrates that by using only the 2014 retrospective data, we were able to represent a relatively even distribution in PAI vs FNB cases since this was the midpoint in utilization of each modality of postoperative analgesia. Table 2 summarizes the calculated mean and SD for the study variables for each group.

    Our analysis demonstrated that patients who received a regional anesthetic at our facility in the form of an ultrasound-guided FNB in the PACU had lower documented pain scores throughout their hospital course (mean pain perception scores, 4.48 for FNB vs 5.02 for PAI, P = .0497; Figure 8). Additionally, our analysis showed that patients receiving PAIs received fewer opioids during their stays (mean MEs were 168.59 mg for FNB and 126.45 mg for PAI, P = .0370; Figure 9). Both pain perception and ME had small effect sizes (Cohen d = 0.332912 and 0.353498, respectively) owing to large, within-group variability. The remaining variables analyzed, length of stay, cost of care and readmission rate, were not significant. However, the PAI group did have a readmission rate that was 5 times larger than that of the FNP group, although the difference was statistically insignificant (P = .3678). This difference could represent a clinically significant finding in this exploratory study. Primary reasons for readmission were wound integrity (PAI, n = 3), pain management (PAI, n = 1), and pneumonia (FNB, n = 1).

    Discussion

    Our study sought to gain understanding in the relationship between 2 analgesic modalities and associated outcome variables. The reported decrease in pain in the group receiving FNB could be due to the increased pain medications ordered by the surgeons, or it could be due to less activity related to decreased quadriceps motor function frequently associated with this form of proximal regional analgesia. This was not examined in the retrospective data. Postoperative pain medications were ordered by the surgeon. Use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and/or oral opioid medications given on a scheduled order set could be a factor or factors in the increase of pain medications in this group and account for the reported decrease in pain.

    The readmission rate was statistically the same for both groups in this retrospective analysis. However, the PAI group had 5 times more patients readmitted. The degree of clinical significance pertaining to the observed readmissions in the PAI group strongly supports further study of this topic. The effect this had on costs and length of stay may be significant. In a future study, reasons for readmission should be examined further as well as differences in costs and length of stay. Changing opinions by orthopedic surgeons and modifications in surgical technique during 2014 may have affected the efficacy of analgesic approaches and the resultant outcome variables.

    The primary limitation of this research relates to the design as a retrospective data analysis conducted at a relatively small regional medical center. This study examined 2 groups of patients and was therefore limited in ability to describe the observed phenomena on an individual level or measure the degree of meaning that analgesic technique had on each patient’s surgical/anesthetic experience.39 Factors such as multiple surgeons performing TKAs with or without PAIs, multiple anesthesia providers performing FNBs (the level of ultrasonography expertise possessed by anesthesiologists and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists), and nursing perceptions of as-needed opioid order sets may affect the data analysis to unknown degrees and may have contributed to the statistical evidence found in this research. This retrospective analysis provides possible associations among variables but fails to demonstrate cause and effect relationships. Examining the role of regional analgesia techniques as they relate to improved pain control and lower incidences of opioid-related adverse effects40-42 continues to build credibility. However, the exact causes of lower pain scores and higher opioid consumption were not clarified in the retrospective review of the electronic medical records. Future prospective studies are encouraged to develop deeper understanding of potential causal relationships in analgesic modalities and improved outcomes in patients undergoing TKA.

    REFERENCES

    1.Ranawat CS. History of total knee replacement. J South Orthop Assoc. 2002;11(4):218-226.

    2.Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435.

    3.Losina E, Thornhill TS, Rome BN, Wright J, Katz JN. The dramatic increase in total knee replacement utilization rates in the United States cannot be fully explained by growth in population size and the obesity epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(3):201-207.

    4.Weinstein AM, Rome BN, Reichmann WM, et al. Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(5):385-392.

    5.Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780-785.

    6.Williams SN, Wolford ML, Bercovitz A. Hospitalization for Total Knee Replacement Among Inpatients Aged 45 and Over: United States, 2000-2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No. 210. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db210.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2016.

    7.Bhattacharyya T, Freiberg AA, Mehta P, Neil Katz J, Ferris T. Measuring the report card: the validity of pay-for-performance metrics in orthopedic surgery. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2):526-532.

    8.McCartney CJ, Choi S. Does anaesthetic technique really matter for total knee arthroplasty? Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(3):331-333.

    9.McCartney CJ, Nelligan K. Postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients: treatment options. Drugs Aging. 2014;31(2):83-91.

    10. Ibrahim M, Alazzawi S, Nizam I, Haddad F. An evidence-based review of enhanced recovery interventions in knee replacement surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(6):386-389.

    11. Pine M, Fry DE, Jones BL, Meimban RJ, Pine GJ. Controlling costs without compromising quality: paying hospitals for total knee replacement. Med Care. 2010;48(10):862-868.

    12. Elmofty DH, Buvanendran A. Regional anesthesia in total joint arthroplasty: what is the evidence? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9S):S74-S76.

    13. Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO. Cousins and Bridenbaugh’s Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

    14. Ramsay MA. Acute postoperative pain management. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2000;13(3):244-247.

    15. Goesling J, Moser SE, Zaidi B, et al. Trends and predictors of opioid use after total knee and total hip arthroplasty. Pain. 2016;157(6):1259-1265.

    16. Reardon DP, Anger KE, Szumita PM. Pathophysiology, assessment, and management of pain in critically ill adults. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015;72(18):1531-1543.

    17. Chan E-Y, Teo Y-H, Assam PN, Fransen M. Functional discharge readiness and mobility following total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a comparison of analgesic techniques. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(11):1688-1694.

    18. Chaurasia A, Garson L, Kain ZL, Schwarzkopf R. Outcomes of a joint replacement surgical home model clinical pathway. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:296302.

    19. Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Lind T, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block on pain in patients with severe pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study with individual patient analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(5):912-919.

    20. Ludwigson JL, Tillmans SD, Galgon RE, Chambers TA, Heiner JP, Schroeder KM. A comparison of single shot adductor canal block versus femoral nerve catheter for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9 suppl):68-71.

    21. Macfarlane AJ, Prasad GA, Chan VW, Brull R. Does regional anesthesia improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(9):2379-2402.

    22. Sztain JF, Machi AT, Kormylo NJ, et al. Continuous adductor canal versus continuous femoral nerve blocks: relative effects on discharge readiness following unicompartment knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(5):559-567.

    23. Machi AT, Sztain JF, Kormylo NJ, et al. Discharge readiness after tricompartment knee arthroplasty: adductor canal versus femoral continuous nerve blocks-a dual-center, randomized trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):444-456.

    24. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, et al. Ultrasound guidance versus electrical stimulation for femoral perineural catheter insertion. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(11):1453-1460.

    25. Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD007105.

    26. Barrington JW, Dalury DF, Emerson RH Jr, Hawkins RJ, Joshi GP, Stulberg BN. Improving patient outcomes through advanced pain management techniques in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013;42(10 suppl):S1-S20.

    27. Barrington JW. Efficacy of periarticular injection with a long-acting local analgesic in joint arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(10 suppl):S13-S16.

    28. Joshi GP, Cushner FD, Barrington JW, et al. Techniques for periarticular infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine for the management of pain after hip and knee arthroplasty: a consensus recommendation. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2015;24(1):27-35.

    29. Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(2):325-329.

    30. Horn BJ, Cien A, Reeves NP, Pathak P, Taunt CJ. Femoral nerve block vs periarticular bupivacaine liposome injection after primary total knee arthroplasty: effect on patient outcomes. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015;115(12):714-719.

    31. Rennick A, Atkinson T, Cimino NM, Strassels SA, McPherson ML, Fudin J. Variability in opioid equivalence calculations. Pain Med. 2016;17(5):892-898.

    32. Yaksh TL, Wallace MS. Opioids, analgesia, and pain management. In: Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollman B, eds. Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2011:481-526.

    33. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279-282.

    34. Lortie. Power & effect sizes. Design Experiments blog. September 25, 2015. http://www.designexperiments.org/?p=192. Accessed November 15, 2016.

    35. Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(17):1386-1397.

    36. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(14):1016-1022.

    37. Vina ER, Cloonan YK, Ibrahim SA, Hannon MJ, Boudreau RM, Kwoh CK. Race, gender and total knee replacement consideration: the role of social support. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(7):1103-1111.

    38. US Census Bureau. QuickFacts: Watauga County, North Carolina. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/wataugacountynorthcarolina/PST045216. Accessed February 21, 2018.

    39. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):29-33. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.022905

    40. Buckenmaier CC, Bleckner LL. Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective. Drugs. 2005;65(6):745-759.

    41. O’Donnell BD, Ryan H, O’Sullivan O, Iohom G. Ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with 20 milliliters local anesthetic mixture versus general anesthesia for upper limb trauma surgery: an observer-blinded, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(1):279-283. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a3e721

    42. Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Cozowicz C, Zubizarreta N, Ozbek U, Mazumdar M. The impact of peripheral nerve blocks on perioperative outcome in hip and knee arthroplasty-a population-based study. Pain. 2016;157(10):2341-2349.

    43. Vesalius A, deCM Saunders JB. The Illustrations from the Works of Andreas Vesalius of Brussels. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co; 1950.

    AUTHORS

    Kevin S. Henson, DNP, CRNA, is a 2000 graduate of the Raleigh School of Nurse Anesthesia, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. He is the senior director of surgical and anesthesia services/chief CRNA at Appalachian Regional Healthcare System in Boone, North Carolina. Email: khenson@apprhs.org.

    Jill E. Thomley, PhD, is professor of mathematical sciences at Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.

    Lynn J. Lowrie, MBA, CPA, is director of decision support and denials management at Appalachian Regional Healthcare System.

    Deborah Walker, PharmD, is the assistant director of pharmacy at Appalachian Regional Healthcare System.

    DISCLOSURES

    The authors have declared no financial relationships with any commercial entity related to the content of this article. The authors did not discuss off-label use within the article.

    Please click here for a PDF of this article.

     

  • Share